Springsteen Makes a Life-Affirming Rocking Statement With “Letter to You”

On an album wrestling with issues of mortality, Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band join together to create one of their most joyous albums just when we needed them most.

Perhaps touched by the pandemic that has taken so many lives as well as his own advancing years, Bruce Springsteen’s new album Letter to You begins and ends with songs contemplating life’s end. In between those two songs, in an album that serves as a live rousing concert for homebound fans, Springsteen and the E Street Band send a roaring message about what can save America. It is the same message they have been preaching since the 1970s: rock and roll can save our souls. Maybe it is a cliché. But in the hellhole that is 2020, Springsteen and the E Street Band preach, giving us faith and hope.  We may not deserve Letter to You after what we have created in 2020, but it is the album we need.

The album begins with the warning of a “Big black train comin’ down the track” followed by the truth that “One minute you’re here / Next minute you’re gone.”  It is this statement in the opening track, “One Minute You’re Here,” that permeates through the album and its energy.  The album is of a man of advancing years contemplating death and what it means for his life and his art.

Consistent with this theme, the album cover photo by Danny Clinch captures Springsteen in winter.  He stands near the location where John Lennon, one of his rock and roll heroes, lost his life at the Dakota. Springsteen’s eyes look into the camera with the determination he brings to facing mortality throughout the album.

For example, on “Ghosts,” Springsteen seems to be recalling the musicians he has known and has lost, perhaps including Clarence Clemons and Danny Frederici.  But in the face of the losses, Springsteen shouts against his own impending darkness. “I’m alive!” he bellows.  A similar theme runs through “Last Man Standing.”

The album includes three songs Springsteen wrote decades ago, now polished with the help of the band:  “Janey Needs a Shooter,” “Song for Orphans,” and “If I Was the Priest.”  These songs go back to early in his career, with the latter song famously being played acoustically in 1972 by Springsteen when he was seeking a record contract.  

These old songs fit with the new ones perfectly, with Springsteen perhaps realizing he is running out of time to give these early songs a proper release.  He also has commented on how it was just plain fun to revisit these old songs written when his lyric writing was much more wordy than in later years.  

Whatever the reason, the new version of “If I Was the Priest” rushes forth as one of the highlights on the album, ending with a rare album guitar solo from Stevie Van Zandt.  Although I’d heard the acoustic bootlegs many times before, I never realized what a wonderful song it was until this new version (and it’s not just because I like that older wiser Bruce now mostly uses the more grammatically proper “If I were. . . “).

Springsteen wrote most of the songs during a short period of time this year, and based on Roy Bittan’s advice, he avoided creating demos for the songs. Instead, he brought the songs to the full E Street Band, so they all could work out the arrangements together.

Thus, you may notice an energy in Letter to You, a Springsteen record recorded through this process for the first time since the 1980s with Born in the U.S.A. I first noticed the powerful sound of this album subconsciously when I started hearing the opening chords of “Letter to You” and “Ghosts” on the radio when I was not expecting them. If nothing else, give this album time to take you by surprise.

Springsteen seems to be speaking directly to his fans with the lyrics. In the title track, Springsteen tells us that through his music he has been communicating with us all these years, sharing his feelings and thoughts. He reveals that all along he has just been talking with us, as if writing a “Letter to You.”

But current events run through the songs on Letter to You too. “Rainmaker” was partially written three years before Donald Trump became president. And the image of the rainmaker has appeared throughout American culture including in Burt Lancaster’s amazing performance in the 1956 film The Rainmaker, in Tanya Tucker’s “Lizzie and the Rain Man,” and in Steve Martin’s starring role in Leap of Faith. But it is hard not to think Springsteen is thinking of President Trump in invoking the con men of the West who used to promise rain.

Rainmaker, a little faith for hire;
Rainmaker, the house is on fire;
Rainmaker, take everything you have;
Sometimes folks need to believe in something so bad, so bad, so bad,
They’ll hire a rainmaker
.

A possible reference to Trump also arises in what may be the best song on the album, “House of A Thousand Guitars.” The song begins with references to a “criminal clown” who “has stolen the throne.”

But, like the album, “House of A Thousand Guitars” is ultimately about hope, reminiscent of “Mary’s Place” on Springsteen’s post 9/11 The Rising album. Also harkening back to one of Springsteen’s greatest songs “Land of Hope and Dreams,” the new song takes us not on a train but to someplace here in the (hopefully) near future. Perhaps it is a reference to the pandemic someday ending, when we can all come together to find community in the music at the local bars and the stadiums.

Well it’s alright yeah it’s alright;
Meet me darling come Saturday night;
Brother and sister wherever you are,
We’ll meet in the house of a thousand guitars
.

Springsteen told Rolling Stone about how important “House of A Thousand Guitars” is to him : “It’s about this entire spiritual world that I wanted to build for myself,” he says, “and give to my audience and experience with my band. It’s like that gospel song ‘I’m Working on a Building.’ That’s the building we’ve been working on all these years. It also speaks somewhat to the spiritual life of the nation. It may be one of my favorite songs I’ve ever written. It draws on everything I’ve been trying to do for the past 50 years.”

Similarly in singing about “The Power of Prayer,” heaven is found from entering a bar and hearing the voice of Ben E. King.

Yet, as the album began with a slow song contemplating death, the final song “I’ll See You In My Dreams” contemplates a lost friend: “And though you’re gone / And my heart’s been emptied it seems / I’ll see you in my dreams.” Springsteen notes that our human connections live on, through such things as shared memories (records, guitars, books, etc.). And that we will all meet again, if not in another world, then in our dreams and memories of one another, as he asserts, “For death is not the end.”

In the book Denial of Death, Ernest Becker wrote about how humans deal with the inevitability of death. He advised that the best way to live was to confront the fears openly, so that whatever humans do “on this planet has to be done in the lived truth of the terror of creation, of the grotesque, of the rumble of panic underneath everything. Otherwise it is false.”

As he sings in the title track here, Springsteen has always tried to reveal what his “heart finds true.” And for decades, he has been bringing together fans in life-affirming bars, concert halls, and stadiums. Now that the pandemic has tried to take that live human connection from us, Springsteen’s new (and possibly last?) album Letter to You faces the rumble of our terrors and panic. And he comes out preaching. And what he preaches is the power of truth, joy, memories, togetherness, and rock and roll.

What do you think of the Letter to You? Leave your two cents in the comments.

  • I’ll See You In My Dreams: Goodbye 2020, Hello 2021
  • Springsteen Releasing “Letter to You”
  • Penn State Riots, Sports, and Life
  • Midnight in Paris (short review)
  • Life Lessons – From a Pulitzer-Prize Winner, a Country Star, and an American Idol
  • 10 Thoughts on Bruce Springsteen’s “Only the Strong Survive”
  • ( Some related Chimesfreedom posts.)

    Penn State Riots, Sports, and Life

    Penn State Nittany Lions Family

    Everyone has been trying to make sense of the recent events at Penn State. Many wonder how Coach Joe Paterno failed to do more when his assistant allegedly raped a small boy, and they wonder why the administration let a sex offender slide for so long. I have wondered about those questions too, but I also have been pondering the contrasting ways that people reacted to the story. Despite the overwhelming criticism of Paterno’s failure to do more, many Penn State students, alum, and fans continue to show support for Paterno.

    Many criticize the Penn State fans who rioted when the university Board of Trustees fired Paterno late at night. Students gathered that night, and then they tore down light posts and flipped over a news van. Then, on Saturday, Penn State fans showed up for the game against Nebraska showing their support for the fired coach. Meanwhile, commentators questioned how some Penn State fans could rally around Paterno and be upset at his dismissal.

    There is nothing unique about Penn State fans. Had the scandal occurred elsewhere, many of the football fans now condemning Paterno and Penn State would be rallying around their own beloved coach. What is it about sports that causes us to act that way? Why do we become so passionate that we become angry at other fans in different colors? Why might we continue to support players and coaches on our own team when they have done something illegal or immoral?

    In Time Magazine, Sean Gregory wrote that the rioting was “senseless” and that the students felt personally wronged when the school fired Paterno. Further, “If there’s one image that speaks to America’s twisted relationship with college sports, it’s the Penn State pro-Paterno rallies.” I understand the sentiment and the criticism of college sports, but it is wrong to distance ourselves so much from the rioting college students. The motivations that led them to riot are motivations that move us every day.

    A Penn State graduate tried to find some sense in the riots. Michael Weinrab wrote in a Grantland article that quoted a student who explained, “Being accepted to Penn State felt like a family, and Joe Paterno was the father.” That statement does not tell the whole story, but it starts to help us make sense of the Paterno supporters and to get a little nearer to understanding the supporters instead of just chalking it up to “senseless” college students.

    Previous Chimesfreedom posts have discussed the work of cultural anthropologist Ernest Becker, who pondered similar questions about human behavior. In books like The Denial of Death, he explained that many of the things we do, like root for sports teams, is done to give meaning to our lives. When someone challenges the things that give meaning to our lives, it upsets us.

    Ernest Becker Denial of DeathBecker’s book touches on several themes, but a principal theme may be summarized (in a somewhat oversimplified way): (1) human beings are intelligent; (2) because we are intelligent, we are faced with the knowledge that we are rotting pieces of animal flesh that will someday die; (3) this knowledge of our mortality is overwhelming, so we push the knowledge to our subconscious; (4) to help us deal with our knowledge of mortality, we subconsciously latch onto various cultural devices that help us suppress our fear of death — such as activities that make us feel immortal, like patriotism, shopping, or rooting for sports teams. Our subconscious quest for immortality may drive us to do things that benefit others, but it also may make us hostile to others who have belief systems different from us.

    Terror Management Theory” psychologists have done significant research regarding how these theories affect our real world interactions. And Ernest Becker’s books, in particular Denial of Death and Escape from Evil, explain the theories in more detail.

    As an example of the connection between sports, death, and immortality, watch this speech from We Are Marshall (2006). The movie recounts the true story of a town and team rebuilding after members of the high school football team were killed in a plane crash. In this speech, Coach Jack Lengyel, played by Matthew McConaughey, extols his players to live up to their best by reminding them of their predecessors’ deaths. By reminding them of their own mortality, he tells them, “How you play today, from this moment on, is how you will be remembered.” (3:26) If that is not a clear enough connection between sports and immortality, he then adds, “This is your opportunity to rise from these ashes and grab glory.” In a line reminiscent of the Penn State comment about family, the team then chants, “We are Marshall,” asserting they are not mortal individuals but something bigger and permanent that survives even death.

    Most people, like me, will find this speech moving. But it is these same emotions that drove the Penn State fans to riot. In Penn State, those students who rioted this week at the news of Paterno’s firing were not just upset about a coach being fired. Had those students enrolled in another school, they would not have been upset. But, like we all do, they had found meaning — and subconscious immortality — in something larger than themselves.

    Their school — and in particular the Nittany Lions football team and the long-term coach — made them something more than college students worried about life and their futures. By being a Penn State fan, those students were attached to something large and permanent that made them feel immortal, like they could rise from the ashes. And then when the power of the coach and the team was revealed to be a fraud, it made them feel like they lost their own power and were closer to being a weak, powerless animal. They foolishly and subconsciously hoped to re-establish this lost power through their riots.

    None of this explanation is to offer an excuse for the riots. But as in everything, it is always good when we try to understand why someone else acts as they do, because we all are human. This weekend when I watch my favorite football team I will try to remember that it is just a game, but I will probably forget.

  • Life Lessons – From a Pulitzer-Prize Winner, a Country Star, and an American Idol
  • Springsteen Makes a Life-Affirming Rocking Statement With “Letter to You”
  • Midnight in Paris (short review)
  • Death in Movies That Remind Us to Enjoy Life
  • 10 Best True-Life Sports Movies
  • Flight from Death (Missed Movies)
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)


    Midnight in Paris (short review)

    Midnight in Paris Midnight in Paris is a very good light-hearted entry from director Woody Allen and starring Owen Wilson. The film begins with Wilson and his fiance, played by Rachel McAdams, visiting Paris. Wilson is a screenwriter struggling to write his first book. Wilson loves Paris and longs for the literary Paris of the past, and then his desire to live in the past comes true. One night, after he gets lost walking back to his hotel, he ends up back in the 1920s where he encounters F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald, as well as other artists from that era. After the night’s adventure, he goes back to his hotel and the twenty-first century, but he plans to visit his friends from the 1920s again the next evening. What will he see and what will he learn from his trips to the romantic 1920s?

    I realize different people have different feelings about films directed by Woody Allen. Some adore most or all of them while others are not fans, perhaps because they feel his life has tainted the films, as in a topic we discussed last week. Critics often like Allen’s films more than viewers, as shown by the current Rotten Tomatoes rating for Midnight in Paris (92% critics; 77% audience). By way of disclosure, I like most of Allen’s films; I love several of them; and there is one that I would probably list among my top twenty films of all time (Crimes and Misdemeanors).

    While it is unfortunate that Allen’s films often have to compete with each other, it it is fair for viewers to consider how a new film ranks within Allen’s canon of films. Considering Midnight in Paris in that context, it is not his best work ever, but it is certainly very good. And, more fairly, considering the comedies usually released during the summer, it is more enjoyable and thoughtful than most of them. The lines are witty, the background is beautiful, the story is interesting, and the movie features fine acting from Wilson in “the Woody Allen role” as well as other actors in the ensemble like Kathy Bates and Marion Cotillard.

    Since Allen has started making several films in cities outside New York, he has used the camera to make these other cities characters in his films the way he once made New York a character in films like Manhattan. And Midnight in Paris certainly makes one desire to walk the streets of Paris and live a rich lifestyle there, beginning with the opening several minutes devoted to various scenes around the city.

    Another feature of Allen’s films is that he often addresses serious themes about life and death, and he does so in Midnight in Paris. For many years Allen has noted that he has been influenced by Ernest Becker’s book The Denial of Death, which is about how our fears affect the way we live. Some of those themes are touched on in this film, as are themes about nostalgia and longing for the past. The themes of nostalgia are reminiscent of Allen’s excellent movie The Purple Rose of Cairo. Although the resolution of these themes in Midnight in Paris is fairly predictable, one may not mind the ride because the journey is so scenic.

    What is your favorite Woody Allen film? Leave a comment.

  • Springsteen Makes a Life-Affirming Rocking Statement With “Letter to You”
  • Death in Movies That Remind Us to Enjoy Life
  • “Little Prince” Trailer (in English)
  • To Rome with Love (Short Review)
  • Penn State Riots, Sports, and Life
  • Life Lessons – From a Pulitzer-Prize Winner, a Country Star, and an American Idol
  • (Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)

    Life Lessons – From a Pulitzer-Prize Winner, a Country Star, and an American Idol

    Calendar January 2011 for Tim McGraw Live Like You Were Dying Chimesfreedom wishes you a happy and healthy new year with this post about a Pulitzer-Prize winning book interpreted indirectly through song, leaving you with a question to ask yourself every day throughout the new year.

    Although Tim McGraw is not one of my favorite singers, there are times when popular artists record a song that is undeniably clever and catchy.  Popular songs are popular for a reason.  And I cannot help liking his song, “Live Like You Were Dying,” and the way it also relates to one of my favorite books.

    “Live Like You Were Dying” exceeds anything else McGraw has recorded.  Part of the reason may be the somewhat unusual message in the song.  Although traditional country music has a history of delving into deep adult themes, often modern country music ends up as superficial as most pop music.  “Live Like You Were Dying,” though, summarizes one of the lessons from Ernest Becker‘s Pulitzer-prize winning book, Denial of Death.

    Ernest Becker & Our Mortality

    Ernest Becker's The Denial of Death Becker’s book touches on several themes, but a principal theme may be summarized (in a somewhat oversimplified way for a short blog post):  (1) human beings are intelligent; (2) because we are intelligent, we are faced with the knowledge that we are rotting pieces of animal flesh that will someday die; (3) this knowledge of our mortality is overwhelming, so we push the knowledge to our subconscious; (4) to help us deal with our knowledge of mortality, we latch onto various cultural devices that help us suppress our fear of death — such as activities that subconsciously make us feel immortal, like rooting for sports teams, shopping, exuberant patriotism, writing a blog, raising children, etc.

    There are both upsides and downsides to our subconscious quest for immortality.  It may drive us to do things that benefit others, but it also may make us subconsciously hostile to others who have belief systems different from us.  If you believe something different than I do, you threaten the subconscious protections I have created as a shield against my mortality.  In the last few decades, “Terror Management Theory” psychologists have done significant research regarding how these theories affect our real world interactions.

    Ernest Becker’s books, in particular Denial of Death and Escape from Evil, explain the theories in more detail.  But his work is based on philosophers, psychologists, scientists, etc. going back more than a century.

    What does all this have to do with a pop song by a country superstar?  Although there is an aspect of Becker’s work that initially sounds depressing, there is an uplifting side, and that is portrayed rather well in the song.  One of Becker’s points is that if you are consciously aware of reality — including one’s mortality and the ways we may try to suppress it — then it may help you embrace life and more accurately assess value to the things in our life.

    Live Like You Were Dying

    “Live Like You Were Dying” begins with a friend in his early 40’s telling the narrator about getting bad news from the doctor relating to his x-rays (otherwise the song is vague about the exact nature of the disease).  The narrator “asked him when it sank in,/That this might really be the real end?/ How’s it hit you when you get that kind of news? /Man whatcha do?”

    The friend, instead of responding about being angry or depressed, tells the narrator in the chorus of the song:

    An’ he said: “I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing,
    “I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu.
    “And I loved deeper and I spoke sweeter,
    “And I gave forgiveness I’d been denying.”
    An’ he said: “Some day, I hope you get the chance,
    “To live like you were dyin’.”

    The friend then explains how he became a better husband, a better friend, and a better son.  The chorus repeats with the friend restating the wish about hoping that the narrator gets the chance “To live like you were dyin’,” explaining in the bridge, as the music builds:

    Like tomorrow was a gift,
    And you got eternity,
    To think about what you’d do with it.
    An’ what did you do with it?
    An’ what can I do with it?
    An’ what would I do with it?

    Although the song was written by songwriter Tim Nichols and not by Tim McGraw, the video reflects McGraw’s connection to the song.  In the final chorus, starting at around the 3:00 mark, you see a Phillies pitcher throwing a strikeout to Willie Wilson of the Royals to win the 1980 World Series.  The image is not there because McGraw is a Phillies fan or because he hates the Royals; that’s his dad Tug McGraw on the mound.

    Tug fathered Tim as the result of an affair and they did not have a relationship until Tim was a teenager.  But the two became close later in life.  Tug McGraw passed away from a brain tumor in early 2004, and Tim McGraw recorded “Live Like You Were Dying” later in the year in memory of his father.

    In the song, because the friend is talking to the narrator, the singer is singing the questions to us.  So, you are asked, if you knew that each day was precious and you were dying, what would you do?  The question is relevant to all of us.

    As Ernest Becker explained, we each only have a limited number of days to live.  More than 56 billion people in the world died between Jan 1, 2010 and Jan. 1, 2011, with most enjoying last New Year’s Day not knowing it was their last. Many of us will not be here a year from today.

    Our time here is short, and each day we are closer to death, giving us the opportunity to live like we are dying — instead of just dying. This new year, each month, and each day, including today, is a gift.

    What can you do with it?

    What are you going to do with it?

    Live Like We’re Dying

    Bonus American Idol Copy of Idea and Song Title: In 2009, American Idol winner Kris Allen recorded a song with a very similar title and similar theme to Tim McGraw’s song.  Allen’s song, entitled “Live Like We’re Dying,” repeats the theme of McGraw’s “Live Like You’re Dying” with a riff that may be more catchy to those turned off by men wearing cowboy hats when they sing.

    We only got 86 400 seconds in a day to
    Turn it all around or to throw it all away
    We gotta tell ’em that we love ’em while we got the chance to say
    Gotta live like we’re dying

    The song, written by four writers, is more generic than the McGraw song.  It tries to send a similar message without the personal story of the country song.

    Oa recent road trip, I heard the song late at night driving through New Jersey, and the catchy tune did get stuck in my head.  But the meaning behind the song is not as emotionally powerful as in the personal story of the country song. Give it a listen.

  • Penn State Riots, Sports, and Life
  • Who is Ryan Adams?
  • Springsteen Makes a Life-Affirming Rocking Statement With “Letter to You”
  • Please Remember the Original of “Please Remember Me”
  • Midnight in Paris (short review)
  • Is Your Job Your Life?: Lessons from A Folk Singer & Al Pacino
  • (Related Posts)