Margaret Mitchell’s novel Gone With the Wind was published on June 30, 1936. Mitchell spent about ten years writing the book, using her own imagination, her research, and her childhood memories of family gatherings where relatives “refought the Civil War.” Her work over such a long time period paid off. More than 30 million copies of the book are in print around the world, and David O. Selznick’s 1939 movie version of the novel is considered the biggest earning film of all time if you adjust for inflation.
Like movies such as Star Wars and The Big Lebowski, the book and film Gone With the Wind has rabid fans, calling themselves “Windies.” There is a museum devoted to the book and movie in Marietta, Georgia, which I recently visited. The movie, which deviates from the novel in some ways, has detractors who note the movie’s glorification of the South’s cause and that the film ignores slavery’s inhumanity. On the other hand, some note that the movie and the book have a strong feminist theme, with an unusually strong portrayal of a female lead role for 1939. Is it okay to love and hate a movie at the same time?
Gone With the Wind leaves us with a similar problem presented by Birth of a Nation and other movies. One must ponder how to deal with a work of art that is tainted by ignorant beliefs and stereotypes from a prior time period. A lot of movies have confused messages about important topics. Like anything, the solution is education as opposed to censorship. We might still learn from films, even if what we learn is not the producer’s intended lesson. But it is also possible that the mixed messages may ruin the entertainment value.
Gone With the Wind is a great artistic achievement, but its legacy might be something more if it is used as a starting point for discussion and education about the Civil War and our country’s legacy of slavery. Everything about America and race is complicated, and so is the movie’s legacy. Gone With the Wind features stereotypical African-American characters like Mammy, but then the wonderful Hattie McDaniel broke through a barrier and became the first African-American to win an Academy Award (as Best Supporting Actress) because of her portrayal of the character.
One thing about Margarett Mitchell’s book, though, is certain. There are few twentieth-century novels that have been as popular, or had such an impact around the world, or which still may provoke such controversy, as her 1936 novel about Katie Scarlett O’Hara.
Above is an interesting clip of screen tests for the movie, leaving one to wonder how different the film might have been without the performances we know by Vivien Leigh, Clark Gable, Hattie McDaniel, and others.
Photos by Chimesfreedom.
What do you think about Gone With the Wind? Leave a comment.
(Some Related Chimesfreedom Posts)
Gone With The Wind endures because of its heroine. Scarlett, in a time when women weren’t aloud to assert themselves, she refused to let anything break her. Through all her faults, she was the toughest spirit in an impossible time.
The heroine in my novel, “Don Carina,’ has much in common with Ms. O’Hara. Carina finds the men lacking during war, WWII, and vows to protect her children and siblings regardless what horrific obstacles stand in her way.
Ron Russell
“Gone With the Wind” meets “The Godfather”
The role of Scarlett is certainly a large part of the appeal of the novel and the film. Thanks for the comment.